Proceed with care
Ownership is concentrated or looks coordinated
0 top holders linked to 7 insider network(s).
- 0 top holders linked to 7 insider network(s).
- No official website linked.
- Only one social channel linked.
- Not flagged as rugged.
Mixed picture: some solid signals, some open questions. Size small and keep checking.
- 1This looks like a copy of another token with the same ticker. Confirm the contract address you are buying.
- 2A few wallets control most of the supply. One of them selling can crash the price.
- 3The team's identity is thin or does not cross-check. Anonymous is common, but it removes recourse.
Seven questions, answered
Tap any card to see the tests behind it
- Insider networks0 top holders linked to 7 insider network(s).
- Holder count8,350 holders.
- Top-10 concentrationTop 10 wallets hold 21% of supply.
- Largest holderLargest wallet holds 2.7%.
- Creator holdingsDeployer holds 0.0% of supply.
How much can you put in and still get out?
An estimate from the pool's liquidity, assuming a standard constant-product pool and half the liquidity on the token side. It ignores fees and bigger orders from other traders, so real exits can be worse, especially when everyone sells at once.
Other tokens using the ticker PAWS on Solana · 97
Full technical reportEvery check we ran, grouped by category, with its source
Analyst notes
Paws ($PAWS) on Solana has been trading for 11 days via pump.fun.
Dove Trust Score 66/100: Promising (confidence 100%).
Strengths: Not flagged as rugged. $27.2K of liquidity. Mint authority is revoked: supply is fixed.
Concerns: 0 top holders linked to 7 insider network(s). No official website linked. Only one social channel linked.
Mostly healthy signals, but not enough independent confirmation to call it verified. Review the open items below.
Ask DexVerify about this tokenLast verified 14 days ago · Sources: jupiter, dexscreener · Automated analysis from public data, not financial advice. A verdict is a read on the evidence, not a prediction. How scoring works

