Proceed with care
The liquidity is thin or can be pulled
$5.6K: shallow pool.
- $5.6K: shallow pool.
- Website does not link back to the project's social accounts.
- Shares its ticker with Chainlink (LINK, rank #17). Verify the contract.
- Not flagged as rugged.
Mixed picture: some solid signals, some open questions. Size small and keep checking.
- 1Thin or unlocked liquidity means you may not get out at the price you see. Check the planner below before sizing.
- 2A few wallets control most of the supply. One of them selling can crash the price.
- 3The team's identity is thin or does not cross-check. Anonymous is common, but it removes recourse.
- 4Confirm the contract address against the project's official channels before you buy.
Seven questions, answered
Tap any card to see the tests behind it
Not testable yet for this token: Domain age. Unknown is never counted as safe.
How much can you put in and still get out?
An estimate from the pool's liquidity, assuming a standard constant-product pool and half the liquidity on the token side. It ignores fees and bigger orders from other traders, so real exits can be worse, especially when everyone sells at once.
Other tokens using the ticker Link on Solana · 14
Full technical reportEvery check we ran, grouped by category, with its source
Analyst notes
The Link ($Link) on Solana has been trading for 1 min via pump.fun.
Dove Trust Score 55/100: Caution (confidence 50%).
Strengths: Not flagged as rugged. Mint authority is revoked: supply is fixed. Liquidity sits on the launchpad's bonding curve and cannot be withdrawn by the creator.
Concerns: $5.6K: shallow pool. Website does not link back to the project's social accounts. Shares its ticker with Chainlink (LINK, rank #17). Verify the contract.
Not yet verifiable: Domain age.
Mixed evidence. Several signals are weak or missing; treat as speculative until the gaps close.
Ask DexVerify about this token
Last verified 3 days ago · Sources: jupiter · Automated analysis from public data, not financial advice. A verdict is a read on the evidence, not a prediction. How scoring works