DEXVERIFY
AP

AppleCat

AppleCatCLONE
Solanapump.fun3d old5M7Md5…Gpump
DexVerify's read

High risk

Deployer reputation

Deployer launched 3 other tokens that scored as high-risk.

  • $3.6K: very thin, easily manipulated.
  • Only 11 holders.
  • Deployer launched 3 other tokens that scored as high-risk.
  • Website does not link back to the project's social accounts.

Serious warning signs. Only consider this with money you can fully afford to lose.

42/ 100
Trust score
Evidence coverage50%
Likely clone. Another token on Solana uses the ticker AppleCat and this one looks like a copy of it (see the OG: APPLECAT). Check the contract address before you buy; only one token is the original. How we decide
Before you buy
  1. 1This looks like a copy of another token with the same ticker. Confirm the contract address you are buying.
  2. 2Thin or unlocked liquidity means you may not get out at the price you see. Check the planner below before sizing.
  3. 3A few wallets control most of the supply. One of them selling can crash the price.
  4. 4The team's identity is thin or does not cross-check. Anonymous is common, but it removes recourse.

Seven questions, answered

Tap any card to see the tests behind it

The tests behind this answer · 4 of 4 could be run
  • Liquidity depth$3.6K: very thin, easily manipulated.
  • Market ageBrand new: 1 minutes old. No track record yet.
  • Liquidity locked / burnedLiquidity sits on the launchpad's bonding curve and cannot be withdrawn by the creator.
  • Liquidity vs valuationLiquidity is 99.2% of FDV.
The tests behind this answer · 5 of 5 could be run
  • Holder countOnly 11 holders.
  • Top-10 concentrationTop 10 wallets hold 0% of supply.
  • Largest holderLargest wallet holds 0.0%.
  • Creator holdingsDeployer holds 0.0% of supply.
  • Insider networksNo insider wallet clusters detected.
The tests behind this answer · 6 of 6 could be run
  • Deployer reputationDeployer launched 3 other tokens that scored as high-risk.
  • Social presenceOnly one social channel linked.
  • Reciprocal link verificationWebsite does not link back to the project's social accounts.
  • Contract shown on websiteContract address not found on the website.
  • Official websitex.com is live over HTTPS – “X - The Everything App / X”.
  • Domain ageDomain registered 12,259 days ago.
Position planner

How much can you put in and still get out?

Pool liquidity
$3.6K
Buying AppleCat
28.2%
slippage on entry · You become the market
Selling it later
22.0%
slippage on exit if the pool stays as it is
Comfortable size
$18
keeps entry under 1% · $53 under 3%

An estimate from the pool's liquidity, assuming a standard constant-product pool and half the liquidity on the token side. It ignores fees and bigger orders from other traders, so real exits can be worse, especially when everyone sells at once.

Other tokens using the ticker AppleCat on Solana · 7

Price
$0.0₅3579
-4.8%
Liquidity
$3.6K
Market cap
$3.6K
FDV $3.6K
Volume 24h
$760
Holders
11
Trades 24h
24
50% buys
Market & trust history
History builds as the crawler re-checks this token. Come back in a few minutes.
Full technical reportEvery check we ran, grouped by category, with its source
Contract safety100 · 4/4
Liquidity & market64 · 6/6
Holder distribution76 · 5/5
Identity & community65 · 5/5
Provenance & reputation52 · 3/3
Contract safety
4 checks
Liquidity & market
6 checks
Holder distribution
5 checks
Identity & community
5 checks
Provenance & reputation
3 checks
Analyst notes

AppleCat ($AppleCat) on Solana has been trading for 1 min via pump.fun.

Dove Trust Score 42/100: High risk (confidence 50%).

Strengths: Not flagged as rugged. Mint authority is revoked: supply is fixed. Liquidity sits on the launchpad's bonding curve and cannot be withdrawn by the creator.

Concerns: Deployer launched 3 other tokens that scored as high-risk. $3.6K: very thin, easily manipulated. Only 11 holders.

Multiple serious red flags. The structure of this token resembles patterns commonly seen in rug pulls.

Ask DexVerify about this token

More from this deployer

Possible clones

Last verified 3 days ago · Sources: rugcheck, jupiter · Automated analysis from public data, not financial advice. A verdict is a read on the evidence, not a prediction. How scoring works