High risk
Liquidity depth
$9: effectively illiquid.
- $9: effectively illiquid.
- Only 4 holders.
- No social channels linked.
- No official website linked.
Serious warning signs. Only consider this with money you can fully afford to lose.
- 1Thin or unlocked liquidity means you may not get out at the price you see. Check the planner below before sizing.
- 2A few wallets control most of the supply. One of them selling can crash the price.
- 3Volume or price action looks engineered. Do not chase a chart you cannot trust.
- 4The team's identity is thin or does not cross-check. Anonymous is common, but it removes recourse.
Seven questions, answered
Tap any card to see the tests behind it
- Liquidity depth$9: effectively illiquid.
- Liquidity vs valuationLiquidity is 217.0% of FDV.
- Market ageTrading for 39 hours old.
- Holder countOnly 4 holders.
- Social presenceNo social channels linked.
- Official websiteNo official website linked.
- Deployer reputationSerial launcher: 13 tokens from this wallet in 7 days.
Not testable yet for this token: Mint authority, Freeze authority. Unknown is never counted as safe.
How much can you put in and still get out?
An estimate from the pool's liquidity, assuming a standard constant-product pool and half the liquidity on the token side. It ignores fees and bigger orders from other traders, so real exits can be worse, especially when everyone sells at once.
Full technical reportEvery check we ran, grouped by category, with its source
Analyst notes
CUM ($Cum) on Solana has been trading for 39 h via pump.fun.
Dove Trust Score 42/100: High risk (confidence 74%).
Strengths: No collision with established coins. Liquidity is 217.0% of FDV. Volume is 0.0x liquidity with balanced flow.
Concerns: $9: effectively illiquid. Only 4 holders. No social channels linked.
Not yet verifiable: Mint authority, Freeze authority.
Multiple serious red flags. The structure of this token resembles patterns commonly seen in rug pulls.
Ask DexVerify about this tokenLast verified 1 minutes ago · Sources: jupiter, dexscreener · Automated analysis from public data, not financial advice. A verdict is a read on the evidence, not a prediction. How scoring works