Proceed with care
Little is known about who is behind it
Domain registered 1 days ago.
- Domain registered 1 days ago.
- $22.5K: shallow pool.
- Website does not link back to the project's social accounts.
- Only one social channel linked.
Mixed picture: some solid signals, some open questions. Size small and keep checking.
- 1Thin or unlocked liquidity means you may not get out at the price you see. Check the planner below before sizing.
- 2A few wallets control most of the supply. One of them selling can crash the price.
- 3The team's identity is thin or does not cross-check. Anonymous is common, but it removes recourse.
Seven questions, answered
Tap any card to see the tests behind it
- Domain ageDomain registered 1 days ago.
- Social presenceOnly one social channel linked.
- Reciprocal link verificationWebsite does not link back to the project's social accounts.
- Contract shown on websiteContract address not found on the website.
- Official website1993.forum is live over HTTPS – “1993.forum”.
- Deployer reputationFirst launch we have seen from this deployer.
How much can you put in and still get out?
An estimate from the pool's liquidity, assuming a standard constant-product pool and half the liquidity on the token side. It ignores fees and bigger orders from other traders, so real exits can be worse, especially when everyone sells at once.
Other tokens using the ticker 1993 on Solana · 3
Full technical reportEvery check we ran, grouped by category, with its source
Analyst notes
1993 forum ($1993) on Solana has been trading for 2 days via Raydium LaunchLab.
Dove Trust Score 66/100: Promising (confidence 100%).
Strengths: Not flagged as rugged. Mint authority is revoked: supply is fixed. 100% of LP is locked or burned.
Concerns: Domain registered 1 days ago. $22.5K: shallow pool. Website does not link back to the project's social accounts.
Mostly healthy signals, but not enough independent confirmation to call it verified. Review the open items below.
Ask DexVerify about this tokenLast verified 47 hours ago · Sources: jupiter, dexscreener · Automated analysis from public data, not financial advice. A verdict is a read on the evidence, not a prediction. How scoring works
