DEXVERIFY
MA

Mandela

Soviet Mandela EffectCLONE
Solanapump.fun6d old9y9X9d…Npump
DEX Screener
DexVerify's read

Proceed with care

The creator still holds powers over this token

Creator history of rugged tokens

  • $3.2K: very thin, easily manipulated.
  • Creator history of rugged tokens
  • Only 5 holders.
  • No official website linked.

Mixed picture: some solid signals, some open questions. Size small and keep checking.

50/ 100
Trust score
Evidence coverage70%
Likely clone. Another token on Solana uses the ticker Mandela and this one looks like a copy of it (see the OG: Soviet Mandela Effect). Check the contract address before you buy; only one token is the original. How we decide
Before you buy
  1. 1This looks like a copy of another token with the same ticker. Confirm the contract address you are buying.
  2. 2The creator still holds powers that can change the rules or print supply. Treat every holding as revocable.
  3. 3Thin or unlocked liquidity means you may not get out at the price you see. Check the planner below before sizing.
  4. 4A few wallets control most of the supply. One of them selling can crash the price.

Seven questions, answered

Tap any card to see the tests behind it

The tests behind this answer · 4 of 4 could be run
  • Independent analyser findingsCreator history of rugged tokens
  • Mint authorityMint authority is revoked: supply is fixed.
  • Freeze authorityFreeze authority is revoked.
  • Rug-pull statusNot flagged as rugged.
The tests behind this answer · 3 of 4 could be run
  • Liquidity depth$3.2K: very thin, easily manipulated.
  • Liquidity locked / burnedLiquidity sits on the launchpad's bonding curve and cannot be withdrawn by the creator.
  • Liquidity vs valuationLiquidity is 101.3% of FDV.
  • Market ageFresh launch: 1 hours old.
The tests behind this answer · 5 of 5 could be run
  • Holder countOnly 5 holders.
  • Top-10 concentrationTop 10 wallets hold 6% of supply.
  • Largest holderLargest wallet holds 3.3%.
  • Creator holdingsDeployer holds 0.0% of supply.
  • Insider networksNo insider wallet clusters detected.
The tests behind this answer · 3 of 3 could be run
  • Social presenceNo social channels linked.
  • Official websiteNo official website linked.
  • Deployer reputationFirst launch we have seen from this deployer.
Position planner

How much can you put in and still get out?

Pool liquidity
$3.2K
Buying Mandela
31.4%
slippage on entry · You become the market
Selling it later
23.9%
slippage on exit if the pool stays as it is
Comfortable size
$16
keeps entry under 1% · $48 under 3%

An estimate from the pool's liquidity, assuming a standard constant-product pool and half the liquidity on the token side. It ignores fees and bigger orders from other traders, so real exits can be worse, especially when everyone sells at once.

Other tokens using the ticker Mandela on Solana · 7

Price
$0.0₅3149
+7.1%
Liquidity
$3.2K
Market cap
$3.1K
FDV $3.1K
Volume 24h
$624
Holders
6
Trades 24h
14
57% buys
Market & trust history
$0.0₅3149
Oct 28, 01:38 AM
Full technical reportEvery check we ran, grouped by category, with its source
Contract safety83 · 4/4
Liquidity & market67 · 6/6
Holder distribution76 · 5/5
Identity & community23 · 2/2
Provenance & reputation100 · 2/2
Contract safety
4 checks
Liquidity & market
6 checks
Holder distribution
5 checks
Identity & community
2 checks
Provenance & reputation
2 checks
Analyst notes

Soviet Mandela Effect ($Mandela) on Solana has been trading for 1 h via pump.fun.

Dove Trust Score 50/100: Caution (confidence 70%).

Strengths: Not flagged as rugged. Mint authority is revoked: supply is fixed. Liquidity sits on the launchpad's bonding curve and cannot be withdrawn by the creator.

Concerns: $3.2K: very thin, easily manipulated. Creator history of rugged tokens Only 5 holders.

Mixed evidence. Several signals are weak or missing; treat as speculative until the gaps close.

Ask DexVerify about this token

Last verified 6 days ago · Sources: jupiter, dexscreener · Automated analysis from public data, not financial advice. A verdict is a read on the evidence, not a prediction. How scoring works