DEXVERIFY
SC

SCRVAN

Screaming Vandal
Solanapump.fun1d old9zVq5e…cpump
DEX Screener
DexVerify's read

High risk

Liquidity depth

$659: effectively illiquid.

  • $659: effectively illiquid.
  • Top 10 wallets hold 54% of supply.
  • Creator history of rugged tokens; Single holder ownership (53.82%)
  • No official website linked.

Serious warning signs. Only consider this with money you can fully afford to lose.

28/ 100
Trust score
Evidence coverage50%
Before you buy
  1. 1The creator still holds powers that can change the rules or print supply. Treat every holding as revocable.
  2. 2Thin or unlocked liquidity means you may not get out at the price you see. Check the planner below before sizing.
  3. 3A few wallets control most of the supply. One of them selling can crash the price.
  4. 4The team's identity is thin or does not cross-check. Anonymous is common, but it removes recourse.

Seven questions, answered

Tap any card to see the tests behind it

The tests behind this answer · 4 of 4 could be run
  • Independent analyser findingsCreator history of rugged tokens; Single holder ownership (53.82%)
  • Mint authorityMint authority is revoked: supply is fixed.
  • Freeze authorityFreeze authority is revoked.
  • Rug-pull statusNot flagged as rugged.
The tests behind this answer · 4 of 4 could be run
  • Liquidity depth$659: effectively illiquid.
  • Market ageBrand new: 2 minutes old. No track record yet.
  • Liquidity locked / burnedLiquidity sits on the launchpad's bonding curve and cannot be withdrawn by the creator.
  • Liquidity vs valuationLiquidity is 178.4% of FDV.
The tests behind this answer · 5 of 5 could be run
  • Holder countOnly 5 holders.
  • Top-10 concentrationTop 10 wallets hold 54% of supply.
  • Largest holderOne wallet holds 53.8% of supply.
  • Creator holdingsDeployer holds 0.0% of supply.
  • Insider networksNo insider wallet clusters detected.
The tests behind this answer · 3 of 3 could be run
  • Social presenceNo social channels linked.
  • Deployer reputationDeployer launched 448 other tokens that scored as high-risk.
  • Official websiteNo official website linked.
The tests behind this answer · 2 of 2 could be run
  • OriginalityPossible clone: artwork reused by 20 other token(s).
  • Impersonation checkNo collision with established coins.
Position planner

How much can you put in and still get out?

Pool liquidity
$659
Buying SCRVAN
152%
slippage on entry · You become the market
Selling it later
60.3%
slippage on exit if the pool stays as it is
Comfortable size
$3
keeps entry under 1% · $10 under 3%

An estimate from the pool's liquidity, assuming a standard constant-product pool and half the liquidity on the token side. It ignores fees and bigger orders from other traders, so real exits can be worse, especially when everyone sells at once.

Price
$0.0₆3695
-86.5%
Liquidity
$659
Market cap
$370
FDV $370
Volume 24h
$816
Holders
5
Trades 24h
75
51% buys
Market & trust history
History builds as the crawler re-checks this token. Come back in a few minutes.
Full technical reportEvery check we ran, grouped by category, with its source
Contract safety83 · 4/4
Liquidity & market64 · 6/6
Holder distribution29 · 5/5
Identity & community23 · 2/2
Provenance & reputation42 · 3/3
Contract safety
4 checks
Liquidity & market
6 checks
Holder distribution
5 checks
Identity & community
2 checks
Provenance & reputation
3 checks
Analyst notes

Screaming Vandal ($SCRVAN) on Solana has been trading for 2 min via pump.fun.

Dove Trust Score 28/100: High risk (confidence 50%).

Strengths: Not flagged as rugged. Mint authority is revoked: supply is fixed. Liquidity sits on the launchpad's bonding curve and cannot be withdrawn by the creator.

Concerns: $659: effectively illiquid. Deployer launched 448 other tokens that scored as high-risk. One wallet holds 53.8% of supply.

Multiple serious red flags. The structure of this token resembles patterns commonly seen in rug pulls.

Ask DexVerify about this token

More from this deployer

Possible clones

Last verified 26 hours ago · Sources: jupiter, dexscreener · Automated analysis from public data, not financial advice. A verdict is a read on the evidence, not a prediction. How scoring works