High risk
Liquidity depth
$367: effectively illiquid.
- $367: effectively illiquid.
- Only 7 holders.
- Deployer launched 150 other tokens that scored as high-risk.
- No official website linked.
Serious warning signs. Only consider this with money you can fully afford to lose.
- 1Thin or unlocked liquidity means you may not get out at the price you see. Check the planner below before sizing.
- 2A few wallets control most of the supply. One of them selling can crash the price.
- 3The team's identity is thin or does not cross-check. Anonymous is common, but it removes recourse.
Seven questions, answered
Tap any card to see the tests behind it
- Liquidity depth$367: effectively illiquid.
- Market ageBrand new: 16 minutes old. No track record yet.
- Liquidity vs valuationLiquidity is 5469.1% of FDV.
- Holder countOnly 7 holders.
- Social presenceNo social channels linked.
- Deployer reputationDeployer launched 150 other tokens that scored as high-risk.
- Official websiteNo official website linked.
Not testable yet for this token: Mint authority, Freeze authority. Unknown is never counted as safe.
How much can you put in and still get out?
An estimate from the pool's liquidity, assuming a standard constant-product pool and half the liquidity on the token side. It ignores fees and bigger orders from other traders, so real exits can be worse, especially when everyone sells at once.
Full technical reportEvery check we ran, grouped by category, with its source
Analyst notes
$CHIMPSHOT ($CHIMP) on Solana has been trading for 16 min via pump.fun.
Dove Trust Score 28/100: High risk (confidence 50%).
Strengths: No collision with established coins. Liquidity is 5469.1% of FDV. Volume is 2.2x liquidity with balanced flow.
Concerns: $367: effectively illiquid. Deployer launched 150 other tokens that scored as high-risk. Only 7 holders.
Not yet verifiable: Mint authority, Freeze authority.
Multiple serious red flags. The structure of this token resembles patterns commonly seen in rug pulls.
Ask DexVerify about this tokenLast verified 5 hours ago · Sources: jupiter, dexscreener · Automated analysis from public data, not financial advice. A verdict is a read on the evidence, not a prediction. How scoring works