DEXVERIFY
SI

SIC

super intelligence compute
Solanapump.fun1d oldBwHhgR…WCZ4P
DEX Screener
DexVerify's read

High risk

Liquidity depth

$0: effectively illiquid.

  • $0: effectively illiquid.
  • Website links to different accounts than the listing (X @elonmusk).
  • Only 4 holders.
  • Serial launcher: 11 tokens from this wallet in 7 days.

Serious warning signs. Only consider this with money you can fully afford to lose.

42/ 100
Trust score
Evidence coverage50%
Before you buy
  1. 1Thin or unlocked liquidity means you may not get out at the price you see. Check the planner below before sizing.
  2. 2A few wallets control most of the supply. One of them selling can crash the price.
  3. 3Volume or price action looks engineered. Do not chase a chart you cannot trust.
  4. 4The team's identity is thin or does not cross-check. Anonymous is common, but it removes recourse.

Seven questions, answered

Tap any card to see the tests behind it

The tests behind this answer · 4 of 4 could be run
  • Liquidity depth$0: effectively illiquid.
  • Liquidity vs valuationLiquidity is 0.00% of FDV: price is largely unbacked.
  • Market ageBrand new: 2 minutes old. No track record yet.
  • Liquidity locked / burnedLiquidity sits on the launchpad's bonding curve and cannot be withdrawn by the creator.
The tests behind this answer · 5 of 5 could be run
  • Holder countOnly 4 holders.
  • Top-10 concentrationTop 10 wallets hold 0% of supply.
  • Largest holderLargest wallet holds 0.0%.
  • Creator holdingsDeployer holds 0.0% of supply.
  • Insider networksNo insider wallet clusters detected.
The tests behind this answer · 6 of 6 could be run
  • Reciprocal link verificationWebsite links to different accounts than the listing (X @elonmusk).
  • Social presenceOnly one social channel linked.
  • Contract shown on websiteContract address not found on the website.
  • Deployer reputationSerial launcher: 11 tokens from this wallet in 7 days.
  • Official websiteotcdesks.cash is live over HTTPS – “OTC”.
  • Domain ageDomain registered 65 days ago.
The tests behind this answer · 2 of 2 could be run
  • OriginalityPossible clone: website copy identical to 20 other token(s).
  • Impersonation checkNo collision with established coins.
Position planner

How much can you put in and still get out?

Pool liquidity
$0
Buying SIC
351910561408%
slippage on entry · You become the market
Selling it later
100.0%
slippage on exit if the pool stays as it is
Comfortable size
$0
keeps entry under 1% · $0 under 3%

An estimate from the pool's liquidity, assuming a standard constant-product pool and half the liquidity on the token side. It ignores fees and bigger orders from other traders, so real exits can be worse, especially when everyone sells at once.

Price
$0.0₅2632
-17.2%
Liquidity
$0
Market cap
$2.6K
FDV $2.6K
Volume 24h
$939
Holders
4
Trades 24h
7
43% buys
Market & trust history
History builds as the crawler re-checks this token. Come back in a few minutes.
Full technical reportEvery check we ran, grouped by category, with its source
Contract safety100 · 4/4
Liquidity & market38 · 6/6
Holder distribution76 · 5/5
Identity & community53 · 5/5
Provenance & reputation55 · 3/3
Contract safety
4 checks
Liquidity & market
6 checks
Holder distribution
5 checks
Identity & community
5 checks
Provenance & reputation
3 checks
Analyst notes

super intelligence compute ($SIC) on Solana has been trading for 2 min via pump.fun.

Dove Trust Score 42/100: High risk (confidence 50%).

Strengths: Not flagged as rugged. Mint authority is revoked: supply is fixed. Liquidity sits on the launchpad's bonding curve and cannot be withdrawn by the creator.

Concerns: $0: effectively illiquid. Website links to different accounts than the listing (X @elonmusk). Only 4 holders.

Multiple serious red flags. The structure of this token resembles patterns commonly seen in rug pulls.

Ask DexVerify about this token

More from this deployer

Possible clones

Last verified 31 hours ago · Sources: jupiter, dexscreener · Automated analysis from public data, not financial advice. A verdict is a read on the evidence, not a prediction. How scoring works