DEXVERIFY
💎

💎

💎
Solanapump.fun1d oldC6pfv4…mpump
DEX Screener
DexVerify's read

High risk

Liquidity depth

$81: effectively illiquid.

  • $81: effectively illiquid.
  • Single holder ownership (48.89%)
  • Only 2 holders.
  • Top 10 wallets hold 49% of supply.

Serious warning signs. Only consider this with money you can fully afford to lose.

28/ 100
Trust score
Evidence coverage70%
Before you buy
  1. 1The creator still holds powers that can change the rules or print supply. Treat every holding as revocable.
  2. 2Thin or unlocked liquidity means you may not get out at the price you see. Check the planner below before sizing.
  3. 3A few wallets control most of the supply. One of them selling can crash the price.
  4. 4Volume or price action looks engineered. Do not chase a chart you cannot trust.

Seven questions, answered

Tap any card to see the tests behind it

The tests behind this answer · 4 of 4 could be run
  • Independent analyser findingsSingle holder ownership (48.89%)
  • Mint authorityMint authority is revoked: supply is fixed.
  • Freeze authorityFreeze authority is revoked.
  • Rug-pull statusNot flagged as rugged.
The tests behind this answer · 3 of 4 could be run
  • Liquidity depth$81: effectively illiquid.
  • Liquidity locked / burnedLiquidity sits on the launchpad's bonding curve and cannot be withdrawn by the creator.
  • Liquidity vs valuationLiquidity is 110.0% of FDV.
  • Market ageFresh launch: 11 hours old.
The tests behind this answer · 5 of 5 could be run
  • Holder countOnly 2 holders.
  • Largest holderOne wallet holds 48.9% of supply.
  • Top-10 concentrationTop 10 wallets hold 49% of supply.
  • Creator holdingsDeployer holds 0.0% of supply.
  • Insider networksNo insider wallet clusters detected.
The tests behind this answer · 3 of 3 could be run
  • Price behaviourPrice down 97% in 24h: consistent with a rug or collapse.
  • Volume realismVolume is 1.4x liquidity with balanced flow.
  • Trading activity57 trades in 24h.
The tests behind this answer · 3 of 3 could be run
  • Social presenceNo social channels linked.
  • Deployer reputationDeployer launched 477 other tokens that scored as high-risk.
  • Official websiteNo official website linked.
The tests behind this answer · 2 of 2 could be run
  • OriginalityPossible clone: artwork reused by 20 other token(s).
  • Impersonation checkNo collision with established coins.
Position planner

How much can you put in and still get out?

Pool liquidity
$81
Buying 💎
1236%
slippage on entry · You become the market
Selling it later
92.5%
slippage on exit if the pool stays as it is
Comfortable size
$0
keeps entry under 1% · $1 under 3%

An estimate from the pool's liquidity, assuming a standard constant-product pool and half the liquidity on the token side. It ignores fees and bigger orders from other traders, so real exits can be worse, especially when everyone sells at once.

Price
$0.0₇7356
-97.2%
Liquidity
$81
Market cap
$74
FDV $74
Volume 24h
$112
Holders
3
Trades 24h
57
44% buys
Market & trust history
History builds as the crawler re-checks this token. Come back in a few minutes.
Full technical reportEvery check we ran, grouped by category, with its source
Contract safety83 · 4/4
Liquidity & market62 · 7/7
Holder distribution41 · 5/5
Identity & community23 · 2/2
Provenance & reputation42 · 3/3
Contract safety
4 checks
Liquidity & market
7 checks
Holder distribution
5 checks
Identity & community
2 checks
Provenance & reputation
3 checks
Analyst notes

💎 ($💎) on Solana has been trading for 10 h via pump.fun.

Dove Trust Score 28/100: High risk (confidence 70%).

Strengths: Not flagged as rugged. Mint authority is revoked: supply is fixed. Liquidity sits on the launchpad's bonding curve and cannot be withdrawn by the creator.

Concerns: $81: effectively illiquid. Deployer launched 477 other tokens that scored as high-risk. One wallet holds 48.9% of supply.

Multiple serious red flags. The structure of this token resembles patterns commonly seen in rug pulls.

Ask DexVerify about this token

More from this deployer

Possible clones

Last verified 26 hours ago · Sources: jupiter, dexscreener · Automated analysis from public data, not financial advice. A verdict is a read on the evidence, not a prediction. How scoring works