DEXVERIFY
TO

TON

Tits or Nothing
Solanapump.fun2d oldDV1W6b…EqQvX
DEX Screener
DexVerify's read

High risk

Liquidity depth

$8: effectively illiquid.

  • $8: effectively illiquid.
  • Only 2 holders.
  • No social channels linked.
  • Copycat token

Serious warning signs. Only consider this with money you can fully afford to lose.

42/ 100
Trust score
Evidence coverage50%
Can sellLooks fineDev powersWatch outLiquidityProblemHoldersProblemTradingWatch outTeamProblemOriginalProblem
Before you buy
  1. 1The creator still holds powers that can change the rules or print supply. Treat every holding as revocable.
  2. 2Thin or unlocked liquidity means you may not get out at the price you see. Check the planner below before sizing.
  3. 3A few wallets control most of the supply. One of them selling can crash the price.
  4. 4Volume or price action looks engineered. Do not chase a chart you cannot trust.

Seven questions, answered

Tap any card to see the tests behind it

The tests behind this answer · 3 of 3 could be run
  • Liquidity depth$8: effectively illiquid.
  • Market ageBrand new: 14 minutes old. No track record yet.
  • Liquidity locked / burnedLiquidity sits on the launchpad's bonding curve and cannot be withdrawn by the creator.
The tests behind this answer · 5 of 5 could be run
  • Holder countOnly 2 holders.
  • Top-10 concentrationTop 10 wallets hold 0% of supply.
  • Largest holderLargest wallet holds 0.0%.
  • Creator holdingsDeployer holds 0.0% of supply.
  • Insider networksNo insider wallet clusters detected.
The tests behind this answer · 3 of 3 could be run
  • Social presenceNo social channels linked.
  • Official websiteNo official website linked.
  • Deployer reputationSerial launcher: 83 tokens from this wallet in 7 days.
The tests behind this answer · 2 of 2 could be run
  • OriginalityPossible clone: artwork reused by 6 other token(s).
  • Impersonation checkNo collision with established coins.
Position planner

How much can you put in and still get out?

Pool liquidity
$8
Buying TON
12707%
slippage on entry · You become the market
Selling it later
99.2%
slippage on exit if the pool stays as it is
Comfortable size
$0
keeps entry under 1% · $0 under 3%

An estimate from the pool's liquidity, assuming a standard constant-product pool and half the liquidity on the token side. It ignores fees and bigger orders from other traders, so real exits can be worse, especially when everyone sells at once.

Price
–
–
Liquidity
$8
Market cap
–
Volume 24h
$0
Holders
2
Trades 24h
1
100% buys
Market & trust history
History builds as the crawler re-checks this token. Come back in a few minutes.
Full technical reportEvery check we ran, grouped by category, with its source
Contract safety90 · 4/4
Liquidity & market53 · 5/5
Holder distribution76 · 5/5
Identity & community23 · 2/2
Provenance & reputation55 · 3/3
Contract safety
4 checks
Liquidity & market
5 checks
Holder distribution
5 checks
Identity & community
2 checks
Provenance & reputation
3 checks
Analyst notes

Tits or Nothing ($TON) on Solana has been trading for 13 min via pump.fun.

Dove Trust Score 42/100: High risk (confidence 50%).

Strengths: Not flagged as rugged. Mint authority is revoked: supply is fixed. Liquidity sits on the launchpad's bonding curve and cannot be withdrawn by the creator.

Concerns: $8: effectively illiquid. Only 2 holders. Possible clone: artwork reused by 6 other token(s).

Multiple serious red flags. The structure of this token resembles patterns commonly seen in rug pulls.

Ask DexVerify about this token

More from this deployer

?
?
Solana·15m·pump.fun
55
?
?
Solana·3h·pump.fun
55
?
?
Solana·3h·pump.fun
55
?
?
Solana·7h·pump.fun
55
LA
LAMPORTLamport Robotics
Solana·1d·pump.fun
55

Possible clones

TO
TONCLONETits or Nothing
Solana·2d·pump.fun
55
TO
TONCLONETits or Nothing
Solana·2d·pump.fun
55
TO
TONTits or Nothing
Solana·2d·pump.fun
42
TO
TONCLONETits or Nothing
Solana·2d·pump.fun
55

Last verified 2 days ago · Sources: jupiter, dexscreener · Automated analysis from public data, not financial advice. A verdict is a read on the evidence, not a prediction. How scoring works