DEXVERIFY
PH

Philanthropic

PhilanthropicCLONE
Solanapump.fun22h oldG3iiVn…LJsa6
DEX Screener
DexVerify's read

High risk

Deployer reputation

Deployer launched 45 other tokens that scored as high-risk.

  • $4.2K: very thin, easily manipulated.
  • Only 14 holders.
  • Deployer launched 45 other tokens that scored as high-risk.
  • Top 10 wallets hold 36% of supply.

Serious warning signs. Only consider this with money you can fully afford to lose.

42/ 100
Trust score
Evidence coverage50%
Likely clone. Another token on Solana uses the ticker Philanthropic and this one looks like a copy of it (see the OG: Philanthropic). Check the contract address before you buy; only one token is the original. How we decide
Before you buy
  1. 1This looks like a copy of another token with the same ticker. Confirm the contract address you are buying.
  2. 2The creator still holds powers that can change the rules or print supply. Treat every holding as revocable.
  3. 3Thin or unlocked liquidity means you may not get out at the price you see. Check the planner below before sizing.
  4. 4A few wallets control most of the supply. One of them selling can crash the price.

Seven questions, answered

Tap any card to see the tests behind it

The tests behind this answer · 4 of 4 could be run
  • Liquidity depth$4.2K: very thin, easily manipulated.
  • Market ageBrand new: 3 minutes old. No track record yet.
  • Liquidity locked / burnedLiquidity sits on the launchpad's bonding curve and cannot be withdrawn by the creator.
  • Liquidity vs valuationLiquidity is 71.7% of FDV.
The tests behind this answer · 5 of 5 could be run
  • Holder countOnly 14 holders.
  • Largest holderOne wallet holds 35.5% of supply.
  • Top-10 concentrationTop 10 wallets hold 36% of supply.
  • Creator holdingsDeployer holds 0.0% of supply.
  • Insider networksNo insider wallet clusters detected.
The tests behind this answer · 3 of 3 could be run
  • Social presenceNo social channels linked.
  • Deployer reputationDeployer launched 45 other tokens that scored as high-risk.
  • Official websiteNo official website linked.
The tests behind this answer · 2 of 2 could be run
  • OriginalityPossible clone: artwork reused by 12 other token(s).
  • Impersonation checkNo collision with established coins.
Position planner

How much can you put in and still get out?

Pool liquidity
$4.2K
Buying Philanthropic
23.6%
slippage on entry · You become the market
Selling it later
19.1%
slippage on exit if the pool stays as it is
Comfortable size
$21
keeps entry under 1% · $64 under 3%

An estimate from the pool's liquidity, assuming a standard constant-product pool and half the liquidity on the token side. It ignores fees and bigger orders from other traders, so real exits can be worse, especially when everyone sells at once.

Other tokens using the ticker Philanthropic on Solana · 27

Price
$0.0₅5912
+1.0%
Liquidity
$4.2K
Market cap
$5.9K
FDV $5.9K
Volume 24h
$2.2K
Holders
14
Trades 24h
26
58% buys
Market & trust history
History builds as the crawler re-checks this token. Come back in a few minutes.
Full technical reportEvery check we ran, grouped by category, with its source
Contract safety90 · 4/4
Liquidity & market64 · 6/6
Holder distribution41 · 5/5
Identity & community23 · 2/2
Provenance & reputation42 · 3/3
Contract safety
4 checks
Liquidity & market
6 checks
Holder distribution
5 checks
Identity & community
2 checks
Provenance & reputation
3 checks
Analyst notes

Philanthropic ($Philanthropic) on Solana has been trading for 3 min via pump.fun.

Dove Trust Score 42/100: High risk (confidence 50%).

Strengths: Not flagged as rugged. Mint authority is revoked: supply is fixed. Liquidity sits on the launchpad's bonding curve and cannot be withdrawn by the creator.

Concerns: Deployer launched 45 other tokens that scored as high-risk. $4.2K: very thin, easily manipulated. Only 14 holders.

Multiple serious red flags. The structure of this token resembles patterns commonly seen in rug pulls.

Ask DexVerify about this token

More from this deployer

Possible clones

Last verified 22 hours ago · Sources: jupiter, dexscreener · Automated analysis from public data, not financial advice. A verdict is a read on the evidence, not a prediction. How scoring works