DEXVERIFY
WT

WTS

WTSCLONE
Solanapump.fun6d oldJCg3Jp…epump
DexVerify's read

High risk

Largest holder

One wallet holds 49.9% of supply.

  • $1.9K: very thin, easily manipulated.
  • Creator history of rugged tokens; Single holder ownership (49.92%)
  • Only 6 holders.
  • Top 10 wallets hold 50% of supply.

Serious warning signs. Only consider this with money you can fully afford to lose.

42/ 100
Trust score
Evidence coverage50%
Likely clone. Another token on Solana uses the ticker WTS and this one looks like a copy of it (see the OG: WTS). Check the contract address before you buy; only one token is the original. How we decide
Before you buy
  1. 1This looks like a copy of another token with the same ticker. Confirm the contract address you are buying.
  2. 2The creator still holds powers that can change the rules or print supply. Treat every holding as revocable.
  3. 3Thin or unlocked liquidity means you may not get out at the price you see. Check the planner below before sizing.
  4. 4A few wallets control most of the supply. One of them selling can crash the price.

Seven questions, answered

Tap any card to see the tests behind it

The tests behind this answer · 4 of 4 could be run
  • Independent analyser findingsCreator history of rugged tokens; Single holder ownership (49.92%)
  • Mint authorityMint authority is revoked: supply is fixed.
  • Freeze authorityFreeze authority is revoked.
  • Rug-pull statusNot flagged as rugged.
The tests behind this answer · 4 of 4 could be run
  • Liquidity depth$1.9K: very thin, easily manipulated.
  • Market ageBrand new: 1 minutes old. No track record yet.
  • Liquidity locked / burnedLiquidity sits on the launchpad's bonding curve and cannot be withdrawn by the creator.
  • Liquidity vs valuationLiquidity is 63.1% of FDV.
The tests behind this answer · 5 of 5 could be run
  • Holder countOnly 6 holders.
  • Largest holderOne wallet holds 49.9% of supply.
  • Top-10 concentrationTop 10 wallets hold 50% of supply.
  • Creator holdingsDeployer holds 0.0% of supply.
  • Insider networksNo insider wallet clusters detected.
The tests behind this answer · 3 of 3 could be run
  • Social presenceNo social channels linked.
  • Official websiteNo official website linked.
  • Deployer reputation1 other launches from this deployer, none flagged.
Position planner

How much can you put in and still get out?

Pool liquidity
$1.2K
Buying WTS
86.8%
slippage on entry · You become the market
Selling it later
46.5%
slippage on exit if the pool stays as it is
Comfortable size
$6
keeps entry under 1% · $17 under 3%

An estimate from the pool's liquidity, assuming a standard constant-product pool and half the liquidity on the token side. It ignores fees and bigger orders from other traders, so real exits can be worse, especially when everyone sells at once.

Other tokens using the ticker WTS on Solana · 7

Price
$0.0₅1072
-60.0%
Liquidity
$1.2K
Market cap
$1.1K
FDV $2.1K
Volume 24h
$399
Holders
2
Trades 24h
52
52% buys
Market & trust history
History builds as the crawler re-checks this token. Come back in a few minutes.
Full technical reportEvery check we ran, grouped by category, with its source
Contract safety83 · 4/4
Liquidity & market64 · 6/6
Holder distribution41 · 5/5
Identity & community23 · 2/2
Provenance & reputation100 · 3/3
Contract safety
4 checks
Liquidity & market
6 checks
Holder distribution
5 checks
Identity & community
2 checks
Provenance & reputation
3 checks
Analyst notes

WTS ($WTS) on Solana has been trading for 1 min via pump.fun.

Dove Trust Score 42/100: High risk (confidence 50%).

Strengths: Not flagged as rugged. Mint authority is revoked: supply is fixed. Liquidity sits on the launchpad's bonding curve and cannot be withdrawn by the creator.

Concerns: One wallet holds 49.9% of supply. $1.9K: very thin, easily manipulated. Creator history of rugged tokens; Single holder ownership (49.92%)

Multiple serious red flags. The structure of this token resembles patterns commonly seen in rug pulls.

Ask DexVerify about this token

More from this deployer

Last verified 6 days ago · Sources: jupiter · Automated analysis from public data, not financial advice. A verdict is a read on the evidence, not a prediction. How scoring works